|
Smith Faculty
Opinion Article
|
March 17,
2008
|
|
By Dr. Peter Morici, Professor of
International Business
E-MAIL
WEB SITE
|
 |
U.S. Records $738.6 Billion Current Account Deficit
Today, the Commerce Department
reported the 2007 current account
deficit was $738.6 billion, down from
$811.5 billion in 2006. The deficit
exceeded 5.3 percent of GDP. The fourth
quarter deficit was $172.9 billion.
The current account is the broadest
measure of the U.S. trade balance. In
addition to trade in goods and services,
it includes income received from U.S.
investments abroad less payments to
foreigners on their investments in the
United States.
In the 2007, the United States had a
$106.9 surplus on trade in services and
a $106.9 billion surplus on income
payments. This was hardly enough to
offset the massive $815.9 billion
deficit on trade in goods, and net
unilateral transfers to foreigners equal
to $104.4 billion.
The huge deficit on trade in goods is
mostly caused by a combination of an
overvalued dollar against the Chinese
yuan, a dysfunctional national energy
policy that increases U.S. dependence on
foreign oil, and the competitive woes of
the three domestic automakers. Together,
the trade deficit with China and on
petroleum and automotive products total
at least 100 percent of the deficit on
trade in goods and services.
To finance the current account
deficit, Americans are borrowing and
selling assets at a pace of $600 billion
a year. U.S. foreign debt is about $6.5
trillion. At 5 percent interest, the
debt service would come to about $2000 a
year for every working American.
The current account deficit imposes a
significant tax on GDP growth by moving
workers from export and import-competing
industries to other sectors of the
economy. This reduces labor
productivity, research and development
spending, and important investments in
human capital. In 2007 the trade deficit
is slicing about $250 billion off GDP,
and longer term, it reduces potential
annual GDP growth to about 3 percent
from about 4 percent.
Financing the Deficit
The current account deficit must be
financed by a capital account surplus,
either by foreigners investing in the
U.S. economy or loaning Americans money.
Some analysts argue that the deficit
reflects U.S. economic strength, because
foreigners find many promising
investments here. The details of U.S.
financing belie this argument.
U.S. investments abroad were $
1,206.3 billion, while foreigners
invested $1,863.7 billion in the United
States. Of that latter total, only $204
billion or 11 percent was direct
investment in U.S. productive assets.
The remaining net capital inflows were
foreign purchases of Treasury
securities, corporate bonds, bank
accounts, currency, and other paper
assets. Essentially, Americans borrowed
or sold off real estate and other assets
of about $600 billion to consume about
5.3 percent more than they produced.
Foreign governments loaned Americans
$412.7 billion or 3 percent of GDP. The
Chinese and other governments are
essentially bankrolling U.S. consumers,
who in turn are mortgaging their
children’s income.
The cumulative effects of this
borrowing are frightening. The total
external debt now is about $6.5
trillion. The debt service at 5 percent
interest, amounts to $2000 for each
working American.
The Chinese government alone holds
enough U.S. and other foreign reserves
to purchase about 10 percent of the
shares of all publicly traded U.S.
companies. The U.S. trade deficit is the
primary driver behind this phenomenon.
Consequences for Economic Growth
High and rising trade deficits tax
economic growth. Specifically, each
dollar spent on imports that is not
matched by a dollar of exports reduces
domestic demand and employment, and
shifts workers into activities where
productivity is lower.
Productivity is at least 50 percent
higher in industries that export and
compete with imports, and reducing the
trade deficit and moving workers into
these industries would increase GDP.
Were the trade deficit cut in half,
GDP would increase by about $250 billion
or more than $1700 for every working
American. Workers’ wages would not be
lagging inflation, and ordinary working
Americans would more easily find jobs
paying higher wages and offering decent
benefits.
Manufacturers are particularly hard
hit by this subsidized competition.
Through recession and recovery, the
manufacturing sector has lost 3.6
million jobs since 2000. Following the
pattern of past economic recoveries, the
manufacturing sector should have
regained at least 2 million of those
jobs, especially given the very strong
productivity growth accomplished in
durable goods and throughout
manufacturing.
Longer-term, persistent U.S. trade
deficits are a substantial drag on
growth. U.S. import-competing and export
industries spend three-times the
national average on industrial R&D, and
encourage more investments in skills and
education than other sectors of the
economy. By shifting employment away
from trade-competing industries, the
trade deficit reduces U.S. investments
in new methods and products, and skilled
labor.
Cutting the trade deficit in half
would boost U.S. GDP growth by one
percentage point a year, and the trade
deficits of the last two decades have
reduced U.S. growth by one percentage
point a year.
Lost growth is cumulative. Thanks to
the record trade deficits accumulated
over the last 10 years, the U.S. economy
is about $1.5 trillion smaller. This
comes to about $10,000 per worker.
Had the Administration and the
Congress acted responsibly to reduce the
deficit, American workers would be much
better off, tax revenues would be much
larger, and the federal deficit could be
eliminated without cutting spending.
The damage grows larger each month,
as the Bush administration dallies and
ignores the corrosive consequences of
the trade deficit.
Peter Morici is a professor at the
Robert H. Smith School of Business and former Chief Economist at
the U.S. International Trade Commission. ►More Faculty
Opinion Articles |